My Library and Courses
Last Update: Wednesday June 23, 2021

What Did We Ever Do Without Our Universe View?

UniverseViews: More Working Articles

Editor's note: "Working article" means "always in process."
  •   Finite or Infinite? Is That The Question?
  •   Finite & Infinite:  Part II
  •   Quiet Expansion or the Big Bang?
  •   "Good" in Science, Business & Religion?
  •   Everything Starts Most Simply
  •   Tilings & Tessellations 
  •   Planck Time- Planck Length Chart
  •   Just What's Happening Here?

A working overview and Table of Contents

Take a tour of the Big Board-little universe
and its Universe Table
: A short introduction

#1: The Planck Length
#2: The Range or Scale of the Universe
#3: Just by the width of a hair
#4: Discover your child within
#5: From caveats to mea culpa
#6: Water, water everywhere
#7: Transition to the Human Scale
#8: An Unknown Section of the Universe
#9: Transition to the Large Scale Universe
#10: The Observable Universe

UniverseViews: An Overview

  •   A Wiki-like Overview 
  •   Our first page about this process in 2011
  •   Simple concept, simple beginnings
  •   Extremely small and extremely large numbers
  •   First principles & the concept of perfection
  •   Building Bridges

Integrative studies

1.  A focus on the universe, universals and constants,
      and the meaning and value of life.

2.  A possible step toward a Theory of Everything Similar
3.  What is the path to economic independence?
4.  Innovate. Make the world a better place
5.  Simple facts can open our creativity
6.  Transform the very nature of television
7.  Get creative. Listen to every idea. 
     Cultivate ideas.  Cultivate your genius
8.  Stretch. Here is the beginning of a new revolution

1957: The First Systematic Universe View

In 1957 when Kees Boeke's book, Cosmic Vision,The Universe in 40 Jumps, was published, he had the attention of prominent scientists.  Then, the Eames film, the Morrison's book, Powers of Ten, the IMAX (Smithsonian) movie (guide), and the Huang's scale of the universe opened this conceptual door for anyone who chose to walk through it.  Anyone could begin to have a systematic view of the entire universe.

It was a fundamental paradigm shift; all the attention given to it was justified.

Most of the world's people live within their OwnView.  Even though subjective and often quite naïve, the elitists, and the solipsistic and narcissistic among us, lift that view as the best view, the only view, and/or the right view.  If and when we start to grow up, spread our wings and begin to explore beyond our horizons, we develop an objective view of the world.  As we integrate more and more facets of our subjective and objective views, it begins to qualify as a WorldView (in the spirit of the old Weltanschauung). 

In light of Boeke's work, the next step for all of us is to bring whatever WorldView we have, and see how it fits and works within a view of the entire universe.

Kees Boeke's work is historically the very first UniverseView. Although Boeke only had 40 jumps and used base-10 exponential notation, it is still the first systematic view of the entire Universe.

2011:  A Second Universe View Emerges From A High School

A high school geometry class just up river from the French Quarter of New Orleans developed what appears to be the second systematic UniverseView.  It is quite a bit more granular than Boeke's work and it originated from the students' work with simple embedded and nested geometries. Using base-2 exponential notation this  group emerged with about 202+ doublings, layers, notations, or steps from the Planck Length  to the Observable Universe.  Eventually along side each length, the calculations from the Planck Time out to the Age of the Universe were added . This fully-integrated UniverseView first emerged in December 2011 and was officially dubbed, "Big Board - little universe." 

The first thought was that this UniverseView with its 202+ notations could be a good container for Science-Technology-Engineering-Mathematics (STEM) education.  It puts everything in the known universe within a simple ordering system.  Then, in January 2012, in the process of trying to find scholarly references to understand the foundations of their work, the students and their teachers discovered Kees Boeke.  In so many ways, it was a vindication,  "Somebody had been here before us."  Yet, even with all the fanfare around Boeke's work, not too much was done to extract meaning from that model. 

The base-2 model was quite different. It has simple geometries and a more granular mathematics.  The students and teachers thought this ordering system might help to answer those historic queries by Immanuel Kant about (1) who we are, (2) why we are, (3) where we are going, and (4)  the meaning and value of life. 

Given this model has a starting point and an end point, the students and teachers opted to see the universe as finite.  Always encouraging students to go deeper in their understanding of mathematics, their teacher, Bruce Camber, commented "To engage the Infinite it appears that we hold the objective and subjective in a creative balance and that balance is called geometry, calculus and algebra through which we can more fully discover relations." 

Boeke's base-10 work has an important role in history.  It gave the human family a starting point to see an ordered universe.  The base-2 model takes the next step. Instead of just adding or subtracting zeroes, it adds 3.333 times more steps or doublings. It provides more data to explore the simplest continuities, relations and dynamics within and between each notation.  Base-2 is the heart and spirit of cellular division, chemical bonding and complexification (1 & 2). 

Perhaps it is here that the academic community might begin to create a truly relational, integrated and functional UniverseView. Surely it is here that we find the rough-and-tumble within science. 

So, although base-2 UniverseView is the second UniverseView, it seems to hold some promise.  And though these are preliminary models,  just a crack in the doorway, what a sweet and simple opening it is.  Perhaps Kepler would be proud.

This high school group is now just starting to grow a little association with real-and-graciously-open scholars.  With the help of the larger academic community, this work might  somehow capture the spirit of one of the world great physicists throughout history, John Wheeler, when he said, "Behind it all is surely an idea so simple, so beautiful, that when we grasp it — in a decade, a century, or a millennium — we will all say to each other, how could it have been otherwise? How could we have been so stupid for so long?:"      

A more extensive introduction to this work is here: