|
Key Idea #3: Throw the book at the thieves.
Thankfully, the
team at Mitchell, Silberberg and Knupp (along with other law firms) won the
Napster and Grokster cases. The Supreme Court made it clear that intellectual
property is protected in the digital world as it is in the physical
world.
Topic for
discussion: Is there a way to bring copyright infringement cases and not
bust your budget?
Answer: Yes.
Here at Small Business School, we were able to convince an attorney to take an
intellectual property case on contingency. The first lawyer we went to said no
to us but through a relative we found great representation. This attorney is
also a judge. He took the case on top of his full-time job which may have been
the key. If you only go to lawyers who are starving, they can't afford to work
for you while betting on the come. To win him over, we presented the facts in
detail and provided hard evidence that our intellectual property had been
stolen.
He made an offer to
the offending party and they paid us rather than be taken to court. We gave our
attorney one third of the funds he collected for us so it was a win-win. The
financial part was satisfying but the legal settlement and the admission on the
part of the guilty party was also sweet.
As Mark Litvack
said, litigation is expensive and we probably only have time to go after the
bad guys who are using our property to make money. The rest of the thieves need
to be taught right from wrong. The attorney you use on a regular basis can send
a tough letter to anyone you find stealing your intellectual property. This
action can and will stop the person who is stealing casually.
If you have
required all employees to sign an agreement that they understand your company
has intellectual property and they will not steal from you during or after
their employment with you, you will have solid grounds to sue if they do. Bob
Tarcea told us that a former employee stole from him and went straight to his
competitor with his intellectual property. Bob even thinks she may have been
working for both companies at the same time. Sadly, we all have to stop being
so trusting and so naive.
You think about
it: Who could you get to represent you if you needed to sue or threaten to
sue? |